You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. MARTIN L. ROMERO

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2008-11-14
QUISUMBING, J.
Before an accused can be held liable for estafa under Article 315, paragraph 2(d) of the Revised Penal Code, as amended by Republic Act No. 4885,[12] the following elements must concur: (1) postdating or issuance of a check in payment of an obligation contracted at the time the check was issued; (2) insufficiency of funds to cover the check; and (3) damage to the payee thereof.[13] These elements are present in the instant case.