Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 183824 2010-12-08	MYRNA P. ANTONE v. LEO R. BERONILLA PEREZ, J.
In Labaro v. Panay,[40] this Court dealt with a similar defect in the following manner: It must, however, be stressed that if the public prosecution is aggrieved by any order or ruling of the trial judge in a criminal case, the OSG, and not the prosecutor, must be the one to question the order or ruling before us.[41] xxx
	GR No. 171175 2009-10-09	PEOPLE v. ARTURO F. DUCA LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
And in Labaro v. Panay,[13] the Court held: The OSG is the law office of the Government authorized by law to represent the Government or the People of the Philippines before us and before the Court of Appeals in all criminal proceedings, or before any court, tribunal, body, or commission in any matter, action, or proceeding which, in the opinion of the Solicitor General, affects the welfare of the people as the ends of justice may require.[14]