This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2008-03-24 |
CORONA, J. |
||||
| Intervenor's rights may not be fully protected in a separate proceeding.[5] | |||||
|
2004-07-27 |
CARPIO, J. |
||||
| The trial court had a valid reason to deny petitioner's intervention. An intervention is ordinarily not permitted if the prospective intervenor's rights can be fully protected in a separate proceeding.[35] In this case, even if the trial court allowed it, petitioner's intervention in the action for quieting of title would have been futile. | |||||