This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2007-06-08 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| The factual findings of administrative agencies are generally held to be binding and even final as long as they are supported by substantial evidence in the record of the case.[22] This is especially true in this case where the Labor Arbiter, the NLRC and the Court of Appeals are in full agreement as to the facts. No rule is more settled than that this Court is not a trier of facts. Absent any showing that the administrative body acted without jurisdiction or in excess of its jurisdiction, the findings of facts shall not be disturbed.[23] | |||||