This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2008-02-12 |
CORONA, J. |
||||
| It must be borne in mind that an injunction is a preservative remedy for the protection of one's substantive right or interest,[21] issued to preserve the status quo of the things subject of the action or the relations between the parties during the pendency of the suit.[22] The application for the injunctive writ is not a cause of action in itself but only a provisional remedy, a mere adjunct to the main suit.[23] | |||||
|
2006-01-23 |
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J. |
||||
| Preventive suspension is a disciplinary measure for the protection of the company's property pending investigation of any alleged malfeasance or misfeasance committed by the employee. The employer may place the worker concerned under preventive suspension if his continued employment poses a serious and imminent threat to the life or property of the employer or of his co-workers.[10] However, when it is determined that there is no sufficient basis to justify an employee's preventive suspension, the latter is entitled to the payment of salaries during the time of preventive suspension.[11] | |||||
|
2003-12-11 |
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J. |
||||
| Prefatorily, while the issue of labor-only contracting may involve some factual considerations, the existence of an employer-employee relation is nonetheless a question of law. Thus, it falls squarely within the ambit of this Court's judicial review.[9] | |||||