Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

RENATO ALVARO RUPERTO v. JUDGE TIRSO F. BANQUERIGO

This case has been cited 5 times or more.

	AM NO. RTJ-07-2057 2007-08-07	ROSALINA GALANZA v. JUDGE HENRY J. TROCINO CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
The office of a judge exists for one solemn end - to promote the ends of justice by administering it speedily and impartially. The judge as the person presiding over that court is the visible representation of the law and justice. These are self-evident dogmas which do not even have to be emphasized but which we always advert to when some members of the judiciary commit legal missteps or stray from the axioms of judicial ethics.[25] More importantly, failure to resolve cases submitted for decision within the period fixed by law constitutes a serious violation of the constitutional right of the parties to a speedy disposition of their cases.[26]
	AM NO. RTJ-05-1968 2006-01-31	REPORT ON JUDICIAL AUDIT CONDUCTED IN RTC-BR. 47 YNARES-SANTIAGO, J
The office of a judge exists for one solemn end to promote the ends of justice by administering it speedily and impartially. The judge, as the person presiding over that court, is the visible representation of the law and justice. These are self-evident dogmas which do not even have to be emphasized, but to which we are wont to advert when some members of the judiciary commit legal missteps or stray from the axioms of judicial ethics. [19] Failure to resolve cases submitted for decision within the period fixed by law constitutes a serious violation of the constitutional right of the parties to a speedy disposition of their cases. [20] Rule 1.02, Canon 1 of the Code of Judicial Conduct states in no uncertain terms that a judge should administer justice impartially and without delay while Rule 3.05, Canon 3 requires the judge to dispose of the court's business promptly and decide cases within the required periods.
	AM No. RTJ-04-1821 2004-08-12	JOSE E. FERNANDEZ v. JUDGE JAIME T. HAMOY PER CURIAM
The office of a judge exists for one solemn end to promote the ends of justice by administering it speedily and impartially. The judge as the person presiding over that court is the visible representation of the law and justice. These are self-evident dogmas which do not even have to be emphasized but which we always advert to when some members of the judiciary commit legal missteps or stray from the axioms of judicial ethics.[14] More importantly, failure to resolve cases submitted for decision within the period fixed by law constitutes a serious violation of the constitutional right of the parties to a speedy disposition of their cases.[15]
	AM No. MTJ-02-1453 2003-04-29	EDITHA PALMA GIL v. JUDGE FRANCISCO H. LOPEZ YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
The office of a judge exists for one solemn end to promote the ends of justice by administering it speedily and impartially. The judge as the person presiding over that court is the visible representation of the law and justice.[8] Failure to resolve cases submitted for decision within the period fixed by law constitutes a serious violation of the constitutional right of the parties to a speedy disposition of their cases.[9]