Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

RICARDO FORTUNA Y GRAGASIN v. PEOPLE

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 187730 2010-06-29	PEOPLE v. RODOLFO GALLO Y GADOT VELASCO JR., J.
To reiterate, in establishing conspiracy, it is not essential that there be actual proof that all the conspirators took a direct part in every act. It is sufficient that they acted in concert pursuant to the same objective.[14]
	GR No. 171374 2008-04-08	TEOFILA ILAGAN-MENDOZA and ROSARIO ILAGAN URCIA v. CA CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
We have consistently stressed that in a petition for review on certiorari this Court does not sit as an arbiter of facts. As such, it is not our function to re-examine every appreciation of facts made by the trial and appellate courts unless the evidence on record does not support their findings or the judgment is based on a misappreciation of facts.[25]
	GR NO. 152481 2005-04-15	RAMON PABLO Y BACUNGAN v. PEOPLE QUISUMBING, J.
By way of antecedents, the instant case arose from the same incident as the case of Fortuna v. People,[5] hence we reproduce below the narration of facts in said case as decided by this Court:On 21 July 1992 at about 5:00 o'clock in the afternoon, while Diosdada Montecillo and her brother Mario Montecillo were standing at the corner of Mabini and Harrison Streets waiting for a ride home, a mobile patrol car of the Western Police District with three (3) policemen on board stopped in front of them. The policeman seated on the right at the front seat alighted and without a word frisked Mario. He took Mario's belt, pointed to a supposedly blunt object in its buckle and uttered the word "evidence." Then he motioned to Mario to board the car. The terrified Mario obeyed and seated himself at the back together with another policeman. Diosdada instinctively followed suit and sat beside Mario.