This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2007-06-29 |
CARPIO, J. |
||||
| Thus, if the trial court finds that the deed of sale is void, then the action for the declaration of the contract's nullity is imprescriptible.[10] Indeed, the Court has held in a number of cases that an action for reconveyance of property based on a void contract does not prescribe.[11] However, if the trial court finds that the deed of sale is merely voidable, then the action would have already prescribed. | |||||
|
2000-11-20 |
PARDO, J. |
||||
| The issue raised is factual. We may not review the appellate court's findings of fact in an appeal via certiorari.[5] The findings of fact of the Court of Appeals supported by substantial evidence are conclusive and binding on the parties and are not reviewable by this Court,[6] unless the case falls under any of the exceptions to the rule,[7] such as diverse factual findings of the lower courts[8] or the findings are entirely grounded on speculations.[9] Petitioners failed to prove that the case falls within the exceptions.[10] | |||||