Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

RODOLFO S. DE JESUS v. COA

This case has been cited 8 times or more.

	GR No. 195687 2014-04-14	LAND BANK OF PHILIPPINES v. DAVID G. NAVAL VELASCO JR., J.
On August 12, 1998, this Court nullified DBM-CCC No. 10 in De Jesus v. Commission on Audit[13] for the reason that it was not published in the Official Gazette or in a newspaper of general circulation, as required by law.
	GR No. 198935 2013-11-27	MAYNILAD WATER SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION v. MAYNILAD WATER SERVICES PEREZ, J.
In 1998, the Supreme Court promulgated a Decision[5] declaring DBM CCC No.10 ineffective for failure to comply with the publication requirement. Consequently, MWSS partially released the COLA payments for its employees, including members of MWSA, covering the years 1989 to 1997, and up to year 1999 for its retained employees.
	GR No. 169558 2008-09-29	PHILIPPINE CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION v. CA QUISUMBING, J.
On August 12, 1998, the Supreme Court nullified DBM-CCC No. 10 in De Jesus v. Commission on Audit[6] due to its non-publication in the Official Gazette or in a newspaper of general circulation in the country.[7]
	GR No. 158761 2007-12-04	NATIONAL ELECTRIFICATION ADMINISTRATION v. VICTORIANO B. GONZAGA VELASCO JR., J.
The aforequoted ruling was reiterated in Dadole v. Commission on Audit,[13] De Jesus v. Commission on Audit,[14] and Philippine International Trading Corporation v. Commission on Audit.[15]
	GR NO. 156537 2007-01-24	PUBLIC ESTATES AUTHORITY v. COA SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ, J.
In a letter dated July 16, 1999, petitioner sought a reconsideration of the disallowance invoking, among others, De Jesus v. Commission on Audit[9] holding that the DBM Corporate Compensation Circular No. 10 discontinuing without qualification all allowances and fringe benefits granted to personnel on top of their basic salaries effective November 1, 1989 tends to deprive government workers of their allowances and additional compensation "needed to keep body and soul together."
	GR NO. 157492 2006-03-10	NAPOCOR EMPLOYEES CONSOLIDATED UNION v. NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION : CHAIRMAN
3.1 Welfare Fund. The Corporation shall resume payment to the Welfare Fund of employer's share equivalent to 10% of the basic salary as of 01 January 1995 of officials and employees. In turn, employees qualified to Welfare Fund membership shall contribute to the Fund an amount equivalent to 5% of their basic salary. In 1998, this Court, in De Jesus vs. Commission on Audit,[10] declared DBM-CCC No. 10, supra, as without force and effect on account of its non-publication in the Official Gazette or in a newspaper of general circulation, as required by law.
	GR NO. 163935 2006-02-02	NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ELECTRICITY CONSUMERS FOR REFORMS v. ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION CALLEJO, SR., J.
Applying the doctrine enunciated in Tañada, the Court has previously declared as having no force and effect the following administrative issuances: (1) Rules and Regulations issued by the Joint Ministry of Health-Ministry of Labor and Employment Accreditation Committee regarding the accreditation of hospitals, medical clinics and laboratories;[39] (2) Letter of Instruction No. 1416 ordering the suspension of payments due and payable by distressed copper mining companies to the national government;[40] (3) Memorandum Circulars issued by the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration regulating the recruitment of domestic helpers to Hong Kong;[41] (4) Administrative Order No. SOCPEC 89-08-01 issued by the Philippine International Trading Corporation regulating applications for importation from the People's Republic of China;[42] (5) Corporation Compensation Circular No. 10 issued by the Department of Budget and Management discontinuing the payment of other allowances and fringe benefits to government officials and employees;[43] and (6) POEA Memorandum Circular No. 2 Series of 1983 which provided for the schedule of placement and documentation fees for private employment agencies or authority holders.[44]