This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2015-10-20 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| On February 14, 2005, the RTC issued an Order[6] resolving all pending incidents before it, the dispositive portion of which reads: | |||||
|
2008-06-26 |
CARPIO, J. |
||||
| Finally, in Cristobal v. Court of Appeals,[30] we held that "questions relating to non-compliance with the requisites for conversion of subdivision lots are properly cognizable by the NHA, now the HLURB, pursuant to Section 22 of PD 957 and not by the regular courts." | |||||