Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR Nos. 147773-74 2008-02-18	DENNIS MANGANGEY v. SANDIGANBAYAN and the PEOPLE VELASCO JR., J.
The elements of the crime of estafa under Art. 315, par. 2 of the RPC are: (1) the accused made false pretenses or fraudulent representations as to his power, influence, qualifications, property, credit, agency, business, or imaginary transactions; (2) such false pretenses or fraudulent representations were made prior to or simultaneous with the commission of the fraud; (3) such false pretenses or fraudulent representations constitute the very cause which induced the offended party to part with his money or property; and (4) as a result thereof, the offended party suffered damage.[17]
	GR NO. 165711 2006-06-30	HERMOSO ARRIOLA v. SANDIGANBAYAN YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
In all criminal cases, mere speculations cannot substitute for proof in establishing the guilt of the accused.[25] When guilt is not proven with moral certainty, it has been our policy of long standing that the presumption of innocence must be favored, and exoneration granted as a matter of right.[26]
	GR No. 148371 2004-08-12	ELSA JOSE v. PEOPLE PANGANIBAN, J.
d. That as a result thereof, the offended party suffered damage."[30]