Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. CA

This case has been cited 5 times or more.

	GR No. 181789 2016-02-03	GMA NETWORK v. NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION BRION, J.
The ancillary nature of provisional remedies means that they are adjunct to the main suit.[43] Consequently, it is not uncommon that the issues in the main action are closely intertwined, if not identical, to the allegations and counter-allegations of the opposing parties in support of their contrary positions concerning the propriety or impropriety of the provisional relief.[44]
	GR No. 187872 2011-04-11	STRATEGIC ALLIANCE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. STAR INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ET AL. PEREZ, J.
In view of CTCII's acquisition of STRADEC's shares as well as the changes in SIDC's corporate structure which were effected as a consequence thereof, respondents also argue that the writ of preliminary injunction granted in the decision sought to be reconsidered is directed against acts already consummated. Although the general rule is to the effect that a writ of preliminary injunction cannot be issued against acts already fait accompli,[37] it has been held, however, that consummated acts which are continuing in nature may still be enjoined by the courts.[38] The propriety of the grant of the provisional injunctive writ sought by STRADEC having been established, we find that approval of said corporation's Motion to Admit and Approve Preliminary Injunction Bond is in order. Contrary to respondents' harping about the lack of showing thereof in the record, Quiambao's authority to file said motion is implicit in the following 21 May 2009 Directors' Certification attached to STRADEC's petition for review on certiorari, to wit: "WE, as the incumbent members of the Board of Directors of the STRATEGIC ALLIANCE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (the "Corporation"), a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the Republic of the Philippines, with principal office address at Quezon Boulevard, Poblacion Sur, Bayambang, Pangasinan, Philippines, do hereby certify that the following resolutions were approved by the Board, to wit:
	GR No. 175371 2008-04-30	BENITO J. BRIZUELA v. ABRAHAM DINGLE CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
A writ of preliminary injunction and a TRO are injunctive reliefs and preservative remedies for the protection of substantive rights and interests.[30] An application for the issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction and/or TRO may be granted upon the filing of a verified application showing facts entitling the applicant to the relief demanded.[31]
	GR No. 174668 2007-09-12	MARLON T. SALES v. COMELEC CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
A case becomes moot and academic when there is no more actual controversy between the parties or no useful purpose can be served in passing upon the merits.[15]
	GR No. 132986 2004-05-19	JUAN PONCE ENRILE v. SENATE ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ, J.
A case becomes moot and academic when there is no more actual controversy between the parties or no useful purpose can be served in passing upon the merits.[6]