This case has been cited 10 times or more.
|
2003-12-11 |
PANGANIBAN, J. |
||||
| Second, in the light of the positive identification of appellants as participants in the perpetration of the crime, their denial and alibi cannot be sustained.[37] Well-settled is the rule that such positive identification, when categorical and consistent, prevails over these twin defenses.[38] Unless substantiated by clear and convincing proof, they are negative, self-serving and undeserving of any weight in law.[39] | |||||