This case has been cited 2 times or more.
2001-07-11 |
PARDO, J. |
||||
As to the aggravating circumstance of disregard of sex, the same could not be considered as it was not shown that accused deliberately intended to offend or insult the sex of the victim, or showed manifest disrespect for her womanhood.[11] In fact, the accused mistook the victim for a man. | |||||
2000-10-09 |
PARDO, J. |
||||
The issue is factual. Ordinarily, a factual ruling of the Court of Appeals is binding on the parties and may not be reviewed on appeal via certiorari.[9] |