Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 188794 2015-09-02	HONESTO OGAYON Y DIAZ v. PEOPLE BRION, J.
The rulings in Malaloan v. Court of Appeals,[53] People v. Court of Appeals,[54] and People v. Correa[55] are without significance to the present case. As mentioned, Malaloan v. Court of Appeals involved the question of where motions to quash search warrants should be filed, and the guidelines set therein was applied in People v. Court of Appeals. People v. Correa, on the other hand, involved a warrantless search of a moving vehicle.
	GR No. 188611 2010-06-16	PEOPLE v. BELEN MARIACOS NACHURA, J.
Jurisprudence defines "transport" as "to carry or convey from one place to another."[30] There is no definitive moment when an accused "transports" a prohibited drug. When the circumstances establish the purpose of an accused to transport and the fact of transportation itself, there should be no question as to the perpetration of the criminal act.[31] The fact that there is actual conveyance suffices to support a finding that the act of transporting was committed and it is immaterial whether or not the place of destination is reached.[32]