You're currently signed in as:
User

REQUEST OF JUDGE EDUARDO F. CARTAGENA

This case has been cited 5 times or more.

2011-02-22
PER CURIAM
In Sinaon, Sr.,[6] we penalized a judge for his deliberate failure to comply with our directive requiring him to file a comment. We disciplined another judge in Noe  Cangco Zarate v. Judge Isauro M. Balderian[7] for his refusal to comply with the Court's resolution requiring him to file a comment on the administrative charge against him. In Request of Judge Eduardo F. Cartagena, etc.,[8] we dismissed the judge for his repeated violation of a circular of the Supreme Court. In fact, we have already reprimanded and warned Judge Limsiaco for his failure to timely heed the Court's directives in Salvador.[9]
2009-11-27
BRION, J.
2) the filing of the complaint is premature, as the dispute between DOLE and SEARBEMCO has not been referred to and resolved by arbitration, contrary to Article IX of the BPPA and Article V, Sec. 30(g)[9] of AO No. 9-98 of the DAR;
2009-07-30
PERALTA, J.
The Court has penalized court employees who have traveled abroad without the requisite authority to travel. In Malayo v. Cruzat,[25] respondent clerk of court was severely reprimanded for conduct unbecoming of a public officer and member of the Judiciary, and suspended for one (1) month without pay for travelling to Hong Kong without the required authority therefor. In Request of Judge Eduardo F. Cartagena,[26] respondent Judge was found guilty of gross misconduct and dismissed from the service when he left for the USA without the knowledge or permission of the Court. In Reyes v. Bautista,[27] respondent stenographer left the country for Dubai to work overseas without securing the necessary permission for travel, but stated in her leave application that her vacation would be spent in the Philippines; she was, likewise, dismissed from the service for dishonesty, gross neglect of duty and violation of Court administrative circulars.
2007-06-22
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
In Re: Judge Cartagena,[4] the Court found respondent judge guilty of gross misconduct when he departed abroad without the knowledge and permission of the Court and was ordered dismissed from service with forfeiture of all benefits and with prejudice to re-employment in any other branch, instrumentality or agency of the government, including government owned or controlled corporations.[5]