This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2014-08-05 |
VELASCO JR., J. |
||||
| As an exception to the cases of Ambil and Cagas, We have ruled in Kho vs. COMELEC[9]that when it does not appear to be specifically provided under the COMELEC Rules of Procedure that the challenged final order or decision is one that the COMELEC en banc may sit and consider, the aggrieved party can, by necessity, directly resort to the Court as the proper forum for reviewing the ruling. Thus, We have granted,in the said case, the petition assailing an interlocutory order of a COMELEC division. | |||||
|
2007-08-24 |
QUISUMBING, J. |
||||
| Election cases must be heard and decided first in division, and any motion for reconsideration of decisions shall be decided by the Commission en banc.[12] | |||||