This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2009-11-27 |
ABAD, J. |
||||
| Two.The accused-appellants point out that the testimony of PO3 Galvez cannot support their conviction since it does not bear the corroboration of the other officers involved in the police operation against them.But the failure of these other officers did not weaken the prosecution evidence.The lone declaration of an eyewitness is sufficient to convict if, as in this case, the court finds the same credible.[11]Credibility goes into a person's integrity, to the fact that he is worthy of belief,[12] and does not come with the number of witnesses.[13] | |||||