This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2009-05-08 |
TINGA, J. |
||||
| It is well settled that abandonment as a just and valid ground for dismissal requires the deliberate and unjustified refusal of the employee to return for work. Two elements must be present, namely: (1) the failure to report for work or absence without valid or justifiable reason, and (2) a clear intention to sever the employer-employee relationship. The second element is more determinative of the intent and must be evinced by overt acts. Mere absence, not being sufficient, the burden of proof rests upon the employer to show that the employee clearly and deliberately intended to discontinue her employment without any intention of returning.[28] In Samarca v. Arc-Men Industries, Inc, we held that abandonment is a matter of intention and cannot lightly be presumed from certain equivocal acts. | |||||
|
2006-09-22 |
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J. |
||||
| We agree with the Court of Appeals that respondent cannot be dismissed for abandonment. To constitute a just and valid ground for dismissal, abandonment requires the deliberate and unjustified refusal of the employee to resume his employment. Two elements must be present, namely: (1) the failure to report for work or absence without valid or justifiable reason, and (2) a clear intention to sever the employer- employee relationship. The second element is more determinative of the intent and must be evinced by overt acts. Mere absence, not being sufficient, the burden of proof rests upon the employer to show that the employee clearly and deliberately intended to discontinue his employment without any intention of returning.[19] | |||||
|
2006-06-27 |
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J. |
||||
| (iii) A written notice of termination served on the employee indicating that upon due consideration of all the circumstances, grounds have been established to justify his termination. Simply stated, the employer must furnish the employee a written notice containing a statement of the cause for termination and to afford said employee ample opportunity to be heard and defend himself with the assistance of his representative, if he so desires, and the employee must be notified in writing of the decision dismissing him, stating clearly the reasons therefor.[54] | |||||