Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

RE: REPORT ON AUDIT v. ROLANDO JAMLID

This case has been cited 6 times or more.

	GR No. 193983 2012-03-14	VICTORY M. FERNANDEZ v. OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN CARPIO, J.
[24] Astillazo v. Jamlid, 342 Phil. 219, 237-238 (1997).
	AM No. P-09-2721 2010-02-16	REPORT ON FINANCIAL AUDIT CONDUCTED ON BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS OF MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT PERALTA, J.
The Court finds Gimena guilty of two (2) offenses, i.e., delay in the deposit of collections and non-submission of monthly reports of collections, deposits and withdrawals in violation of Administrative Circular No. 3-2000 (dated June 15, 2000) and OCA Circular No. 113-2004 (September 16, 2004). The OCA recommended two penalties for the said offenses, albeit in the alternative -- suspension for one (1) month without pay or fine in the amount of five thousand pesos (P5,000.00) with a stern warning that similar act will be dealt with more severely in the future. This should be modified. In Re: Report on Audit and Physical Inventory of the Records of Cases in MTC of Peñaranda, Nueva Ecija,[10] therein clerk of court was found guilty of gross neglect of duty for failure to timely turn over the court collections and submit monthly reports and, thus, dismissed from the service. Similarly, in Sollesta v. Mission,[11] aside from failure to submit monthly reports, therein clerk of court restituted the misappropriated court funds, but was still found guilty of gross neglect of duty and, therefore, dismissed from the service.
	GR NO. 152188 2005-08-08	FLORENTINO R.* BRUCAL v. ANIANO A. DESIERTO QUISUMBING, J.
Pursuant to Section 23,[49] Rule XIV of the Omnibus Rules Implementing Book V of Executive Order No. 292, gross negligence in the performance of duty is classified as a grave offense for which the penalty of dismissal is imposed. Section 9 of the said Rule likewise provides that the penalty of dismissal shall carry with it cancellation of eligibility, forfeiture of leave credits and retirement benefits and the disqualification for re-employment in the government service.[50]
	GR No. 152188 2005-07-08	FLORENTINO R.* BRUCAL v. ANIANO A. DESIERTO QUISUMBING, J.
Pursuant to Section 23,[49] Rule XIV of the Omnibus Rules Implementing Book V of Executive Order No. 292, gross negligence in the performance of duty is classified as a grave offense for which the penalty of dismissal is imposed. Section 9 of the said Rule likewise provides that the penalty of dismissal shall carry with it cancellation of eligibility, forfeiture of leave credits and retirement benefits and the disqualification for re-employment in the government service.[50]
	Adm. Matter No. P-01-1488. 2003-02-07	JUDGE ILUMINADA CABATO-CORTES v. ATTY. VICTORIA M. AGTARAP PER CURIAM
As Cashier and duly accountable officer, he had the duty to remit the Fiduciary, Victims Compensation and City Funds within the period prescribed by the rules.[9] Fiduciary collections must be deposited within twenty-four (24) hours with the Land Bank of the Philippines or where there are no branches thereof, with the Provincial, City or Municipal Treasurer.[10]