Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. CLEMENTE DE LA PEÑA

This case has been cited 8 times or more.

	GR No. 191894 2015-07-15	DANILO A. DUNCANO v. SANDIGANBAYAN PERALTA, J.
With the advent of the 1987 Constitution, the special court was retained as provided for in Section 4, Article XI thereof.[24] Aside from Executive Order Nos. 14[25] and 14-a,[26] and R.A. 7080,[27] which expanded the jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan, P.D. No. 1606 was further modified by R.A. No. 7975,[28] R.A. No. 8249,[29] and just this year, R.A. No. 10660.[30]
	GR No. 175074 2011-08-31	JESUS TORRES v. PEOPLE PERALTA, J.
Paragraph 3, Section 4 (c) of Republic Act No. 8249 (RA 8249),[15] which defined the jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan, provides: The Sandiganbayan shall exercise exclusive appellate jurisdiction over final judgments, resolutions or orders of the regional trial courts whether in the exercise of their own original jurisdiction or of their appellate jurisdiction as herein provided.[16]
	GR No. 166355 2011-05-30	PEOPLE v. LUIS J. MORALES BRION, J.
R.A. No. 8249,[20] which amended Presidential Decree No. 1606,[21] delineated the jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan as follows: Section 4. Section 4 of the same decree is hereby further amended to read as follows:
	GR No. 169519 2009-07-17	IRENORIO B. BALABA v. PEOPLE CARPIO, J.
Upon Balaba's conviction by the trial court, his remedy should have been an appeal to the Sandiganbayan. Paragraph 3, Section 4(c) of Republic Act No. 8249 (RA 8249),[14] which further defined the jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan, reads: The Sandiganbayan shall exercise exclusive appellate jurisdiction over final judgments, resolutions or orders of the regional trial courts whether in the exercise of their own original jurisdiction or of their appellate jurisdiction as herein provided. (Emphasis ours)
	GR NOS. 159104-05 2007-10-05	RODOLFO M. CUENCA v. PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION ON GOOD GOVERNMENT VELASCO, JR., J.
SECTION 2. The Presidential Commission on Good Government shall file all such cases, whether civil or criminal, with the Sandiganbayan, which shall have exclusive and original jurisdiction thereof. (Emphasis supplied.) Notably, these amendments had been duly recognized and reflected in subsequent amendments to PD 1606, specifically Republic Act Nos. 7975[43] and 8249.[44]
	GR Nos. 137355-58 2007-09-25	EUGENIO U. CABALLERO v. SANDIGANBAYAN GARCIA, J.
Petitioners question the jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan over the offense alleged to have been committed by Mayor Caballero because the position of a municipal mayor is not included in the enumeration in Section 4a(1) of Presidential Decree (PD) No. 1606,[9] as amended by RA No. 7975[10] and RA No. 8249.[11]
	GR NO. 138894 2006-07-20	HEIRS OF LATE PRESIDENT FERDINAND E. MARCOS PUNO, J.
Following one request for extension, the petitioners filed their "Response to Show Cause Order dated October 14, 1998,"[9] on November 17, 1998, stating that the application of Section 7 of Rule 141 of the Revised Rules of Court in relation to Section 4 of R.A. No. 7975 would result in an unconstitutional diminution or modification of the petitioners' substantive rights under Section 11 of Presidential Decree (P.D.) No. 1606,[10] which, according to petitioners, had not been expressly nor impliedly repealed by R.A. Nos. 7975 and 8249,[11] which were two later amendatory laws to the jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan. Furthermore, they contend that even in the absence of any constitutional proscription, the Sandiganbayan is of the same level as the Court of Appeals, thus, Sections 4 and 5[12] of Rule 141 should be applied as to the filing fees to be paid.
	AM No. MTJ-04-1552 2004-12-16	DANTE M. QUINDOZA v. JUDGE EMMANUEL G. BANZON TINGA, J,
Section 4(1) of Presidential Decree No. 1606 as amended by R.A. No. 8249[18] clearly provides that employees of the executive branch classified as Grade "27" or higher under the Compensation and Position Classification Act of 1989 are within the exclusive original jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan and not of the MTC. Clearly, any crime committed by complainant, a salary grade "28" employee, in relation to his office falls under the jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan. The record shows that the crimes allegedly committed by complainant were in relation to his office as director of the BEZ.