This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2005-09-16 |
|||||
| The Sarmiento spouses insist that they were not notified of the tax sale. The trial court found otherwise, as it declared that a notice was sent to the spouses' last known address. Such conclusion constitutes the second fundamental error in the trial court's disposition of the case as such conclusion is totally bereft of factual basis. When findings of fact are conclusions without citation of specific evidence upon which they are based, this Court is justified in reviewing such finding.[27] | |||||
|
2005-01-14 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| WITNESS: Yes, Your Honor.[29] | |||||