Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

	GR No. 143688 2007-08-17	PHILIPPINE LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE COMPANY v. BELINDA D. BUNA YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
x x x x. (Emphasis supplied) A motion for reconsideration of an assailed decision is deemed a plain and adequate remedy expressly available under the law.[18] The general rule is that a motion for reconsideration is indispensable before resort to the special civil action of certiorari to afford the court or tribunal the opportunity to correct its error, if any.[19] Failure to file a motion for reconsideration with the NLRC before availing of the special civil action of certiorari is a fatal infirmity.[20] This rule is subject to certain recognized exceptions, to wit:a) where the order is a patent nullity, as where the court a quo has no jurisdiction;