This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2007-01-30 |
|||||
| Petitioner contends that respondent abandoned her job when she voluntarily left. She insists that respondent ignored her earnest efforts for respondent to return to work. She says that respondent was so indispensable to her business so much so that when respondent left, she had to close shop. Moreover, petitioner stresses, respondent filed the complaint 20 months after she left and only upon Mr. Bucad's instigation and the prospect of a monetary award. Petitioner, relying on our ruling in Arc-Men Food Industries, Inc. v. NLRC,[19] claims that such belated filing implied abandonment. | |||||