You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

*GUINNUX INTERIORS v. NLRC

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR NO. 148619
2006-09-19
ABOITIZ HAULERS v. MONAORAI DIMAPATOI
CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
As Lipercon was a "labor-only" contractor, the workers it supplied Novelty became regular employees of the latter. Where the employees are tasked to undertake activities usually desirable or necessary in the usual business of the employer, the contractor is considered as a "labor-only" contractor and such employees are considered as regular employees of the employer.[31]