This case has been cited 2 times or more.
2012-02-07 |
BRION, J. |
||||
To justify conviction for malversation of public funds, the prosecution has to prove that the accused received public funds or property that they could not account for, or was not in their possession and which they could not give a reasonable excuse for the disappearance of such public funds or property.[77] The prosecution failed in this task as the subject funds were liquidated and were not shown to have been converted for personal use by the respondents. |