Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. PRINCE FRANCISCO Y ZAFE

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No.187403 2014-02-12	TRADE v. ASIA PACES CORPORATION PERLAS-BERNABE, J.
Aggrieved, TIDCORP and Balderrama filed separate motions for reconsideration,[46] which were, however, denied in a Resolution[47] dated March 27, 2009. Only TIDCORP elevated the matter to the Court on appeal. Pending resolution thereof, or on October 6, 2010, TIDCORP filed a Motion for Partial Withdrawal[48] of its claim against Paramount in view of their Compromise Agreement[49] dated June 24, 2010 which was approved[50] by the CA in CA-G.R. CV No. 92818, entitled "Trade & Investment Corporation of the Phils., et al. v. Roblet Industrial Construction Corp. and Paramount Insurance Corp., et al."[51]
	GR No.187403 2014-02-12	TRADE v. ASIA PACES CORPORATION PERLAS-BERNABE, J.
Aggrieved, TIDCORP and Balderrama filed separate motions for reconsideration,[46] which were, however, denied in a Resolution[47] dated March 27, 2009. Only TIDCORP elevated the matter to the Court on appeal. Pending resolution thereof, or on October 6, 2010, TIDCORP filed a Motion for Partial Withdrawal[48] of its claim against Paramount in view of their Compromise Agreement[49] dated June 24, 2010 which was approved[50] by the CA in CA-G.R. CV No. 92818, entitled "Trade & Investment Corporation of the Phils., et al. v. Roblet Industrial Construction Corp. and Paramount Insurance Corp., et al."[51]
	GR No. 188612 2012-07-30	PEOPLE v. DIOSDADO CAMAT LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
As encapsulated in jurisprudence, to be liable for Murder, the prosecution must prove that: (1) a person was killed; (2) the accused killed him; (3) the killing was attended by any of the qualifying circumstances mentioned in Article 248; and (4) the killing is neither parricide nor infanticide.[20]