Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 165155 2010-04-13	REGIONAL AGRARIAN REFORM ADJUDICATION BOARD v. CA DEL CASTILLO, J.
Moreover, respondents failed to exhaust administrative remedies[45] when they filed their petition for certiorari before the CA, instead of the Board.[46] The DARAB Rules state that: Rule XIV
	GR Nos. 148939-40 2004-02-13	PEOPLE v. JOSEPH ORILLA CARPIO, J.
Thus, the trial court held appellant guilty of qualified rape in Criminal Case No. 3219-A. The trial court ruled that since Remilyn was only 15 years old at the time appellant raped her, the death penalty must be imposed on appellant, the victim's brother. Appellant committed only one count of rape because while appellant ejaculated twice in Remilyn's vagina, the first and second ejaculations occurred during "one single body connection."[8] The trial court considered Criminal Case No. 3220-A involving the second count of rape as a qualifying circumstance for the purpose of imposing the death penalty in Criminal Case No. 3219-A.