You're currently signed in as:
User

RICHARD HIZON v. CA

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

2004-03-30
PANGANIBAN, J.
The Constitution proscribes unreasonable searches and seizures[18] of whatever nature.  Without a judicial warrant, these are allowed only under the following exceptional circumstances: (1) a search incident to a lawful arrest, (2) seizure of evidence in plain view, (3) search of a moving motor vehicle, (4) customs search, (5) stop and frisk situations, and (6) consented search.[19]
2001-10-17
QUISUMBING, J.
There are eight (8) instances where a warrantless search and seizure is valid.  They are: (1) consented searches;[57] (2) as an incident to a lawful arrest;[58] (3) searches of vessels and aircraft for violation of immigration, customs, and drug laws;[59] (4) searches of moving vehicles;[60] (5) searches of automobiles at borders or constructive borders; (6) where the prohibited articles are in "plain view;"[61] (7) searches of buildings and premises to enforce fire, sanitary, and building regulations; and (8) "stop and frisk" operations.[62]