This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2003-03-17 |
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J. |
||||
| In the present case, respondent admitted that he was unable to pay his debt to complainant. He also does not refute complainant's allegation that he issued a check without sufficient funds therefor. Respondent's issuance of a bouncing check constitutes misconduct which is a ground for disciplinary action.[11] The conduct of every personnel connected with the courts should at all times be circumspect to preserve the integrity and dignity of the courts of justice.[12] | |||||