Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR NO. 165570 2006-02-23	EDWIN SALUSIANO MATUTINA v. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK CARPIO MORALES, J.
That a plaintiff need not conclusively establish the existence of the right claimed to be entitled to a preliminary injunction is, without doubt, settled,[16] a "sampling" thereof to enable the court to consider the grant of an injunction being enough.
	GR No. 139767 2003-08-05	FELIPE SY DUNGOG v. CA CARPIO, J.
The issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction rests entirely within the discretion of the court and is generally not interfered with except in cases of manifest abuse.[18] The assessment and evaluation of evidence in the issuance of the writ of preliminary injunction involve findings of facts ordinarily left to the trial court for its conclusive determination.[19]