This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2007-12-17 |
QUISUMBING, J. |
||||
| In 1996, in the similar case of Republic v. Sandiganbayan (Second Division),[47] we also affirmed the resolutions of the Sandiganbayan granting the motion for a bill of particulars of Marcos' alleged crony, business tycoon Lucio Tan.[48] | |||||
|
2007-08-28 |
GARCIA, J. |
||||
| With respect to the allegation that the petitioners acted as dummies, nominees or agents of "Ferdinand E. Marcos in corporations such as the Philippine Casino Operators Corporation, beneficially owned and/or controlled by the latter," it is noted that allegation partakes of a conclusion of fact unsupported by a particular averment of circumstances that will show why such inference or conclusion was arrived at. In this regard, we are reminded of the Court's ruling in Republic v. Sandiganbayan:[49] | |||||