This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2015-08-10 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| Thus, the demands of justice and fairness were contemplated in the following instances: dilatory tactics and legal maneuverings of the judgment obligor which redounded to its benefit;[38] agreement of the parties to defer or suspend the enforcement of the judgment;[39] strict application of the rules would result in injustice to the prevailing party to whom no fault could be attributed but relaxation thereof would cause no prejudice to the judgment obligor who did not question the judgment sought to be executed;[40] and the satisfaction of the judgment was already beyond the control of the prevailing party as he did what he was supposed to do.[41] Essentially, We allowed execution even after the prescribed period elapsed when the delay is caused or occasioned by actions of the judgment debtor and/or is incurred for his benefit or advantage.[42] | |||||