You're currently signed in as:
User

INLAND TRAILWAYS v. CA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2004-08-12
CARPIO, J.
We uphold the factual findings of the trial and appellate courts. Questions of facts are beyond the pale of Rule 45 of the Rules of Court as a petition for review may only raise questions of law.[37] Moreover, factual findings of the trial court, particularly when affirmed by the Court of Appeals, are generally binding on this Court.[38] We thus find no reason to set aside the two courts' factual findings.