This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2014-04-08 |
MENDOZA, J. |
||||
| Various parties also sought and were granted leave to file their respective comments-in-intervention in defense of the constitutionality of the RH Law. Aside from the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) which commented on the petitions in behalf of the respondents,[55] Congressman Edcel C. Lagman,[56] former officials of the Department of Health Dr. Esperanza I. Cabral, Jamie Galvez-Tan, and Dr. Alberto G. Romualdez,[57] the Filipino Catholic Voices for Reproductive Health (C4RH),[58] Ana Theresa "Risa" Hontiveros,[59]and Atty. Joan De Venecia[60] also filed their respective Comments-in-Intervention in conjunction with several others. On June 4, 2013, Senator Pia Juliana S. Cayetano was also granted leave to intervene.[61] | |||||
|
2014-04-08 |
MENDOZA, J. |
||||
| On March 19, 2013, after considering the issues and arguments raised, the Court issued the Status Quo Ante Order (SQAO), enjoining the effects and implementation of the assailed legislation for a period of one hundred and twenty (120) days, or until July 17, 2013.[62] | |||||