This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2005-11-11 |
TINGA, J. |
||||
| To hold the judge liable, this Court has time and again ruled that the error must be "so gross and patent as to produce an inference of ignorance or bad faith or that the judge knowingly rendered an unjust decision."[22] It must be "so grave and on so fundamental a point as to warrant condemnation of the judge as patently ignorant or negligent."[23] Otherwise, to hold a judge administratively accountable for every erroneous ruling or decision he renders, assuming that the judge erred, would be nothing short of harassment and that would be intolerable.[24] | |||||