Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 193986 2014-01-15	EASTERN SHIPPING LINES v. BPI VILLARAMA, JR., J.
Thus, it is settled that in petitions for review on certiorari, only questions of law may be put in issue. Questions of fact cannot be entertained.[23]
	GR No. 181163 2013-07-24	ASIAN TERMINALS v. PHILAM INSURANCE CO. VILLARAMA, JR., J.
The three consolidated petitions before us call for a determination of who between ATI and Westwind is liable for the damage suffered by the subject cargo and to what extent. However, the resolution of the issues raised by the present petitions is predicated on the appreciation of factual issues which is beyond the scope of a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended. It is settled that in petitions for review on certiorari, only questions of law may be put in issue. Questions of fact cannot be entertained.[26]