Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 172642 2012-06-13	ESTATE OF NELSON R. DULAY v. ABOITIZ JEBSEN MARITIME PERALTA, J.
The above interpretation of the DOLE, DFA and POEA is also in consonance with the policy of the state to promote voluntary arbitration as a mode of settling labor disputes.[10]
	GR No. 140982 2003-09-23	MARIO GUTIERREZ v. SINGER SEWING MACHINE COMPANY QUISUMBING, J.
Indeed, the requirements of due process are satisfied where the parties are afforded fair and reasonable opportunity to explain their respective sides of the controversy.[18] The facts show that Singer had provided petitioner ample opportunity to explain his side in writing, after he was apprised of his alleged infractions. That he deemed his verbal explanation sufficient and opted to forego a written explanation, was a choice he voluntarily made and insisted upon.
	GR No. 138938 2000-10-24	SECOND DIVISION CELESTINO VIVIERO v. CA BELLOSILLO, J.
submit his case to a Labor Arbiter when he filed his Complaint before the proper government agency. Private respondents invoke Navarro III v. Damasco[25] wherein the Court held that "it is the policy of the state to promote voluntary arbitration as a mode of settling disputes."[26] It should be noted,