You're currently signed in as:
User

TOYOTA SHAW v. CA

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

2007-12-13
CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
Consent is essential for the existence of a contract, and where it is absent, the contract is non-existent.  Consent in contracts presupposes the following requisites: (1) it should be intelligent or with an exact notion of the matter to which it refers; (2) it should be free; and (3) it should be spontaneous.[31]  Moreover, a definite agreement on the manner of payment of the price is an essential element in the formation of a binding and enforceable contract of sale.[32]  This is so because the agreement as to the manner of payment goes into the price such that a disagreement on the manner of payment is tantamount to a failure to agree on the price or consideration.[33]
2005-12-09
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
The foregoing terms and conditions show that it is a contract to sell and not a contract of sale. For one, the conspicuous absence of a definite manner of payment of the purchase price in the agreement confirms the conclusion that it is a contract to sell. This is because the manner of payment of the purchase price is an essential element before a valid and binding contract of sale can exist.[9] Although the Civil Code does not expressly state that the minds of the parties must also meet on the terms or manner of payment of the price, the same is needed, otherwise there is no sale.[10] As held in Toyota Shaw, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals,[11] a definite agreement on the manner of payment of the price is an essential element in the formation of a binding and enforceable contract of sale.
2001-05-21
PARDO, J.
"(c) consummation or death, which is the fulfillment or performance of the terms agreed upon in the contract."[20]