Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. YUSOP TADAH

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	GR No. 191722 2013-12-11	PEOPLE v. GERRY SABANGAN LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
In conclusion, Sabangan is found guilty beyond reasonable doubt of murdering Felonia, the killing being qualified by treachery. With the prohibition against the imposition of the death penalty by Republic Act No. 9346, the only imposable penalty for the crime of murder is reclusion perpetua. The Court adds that accused-appellant shall not be eligible for parole. Again, pursuant to Section 3 of Republic Act No. 9346, "[p]ersons convicted of offenses punished with reclusion perpetua, or whose sentences will be reduced to reclusion perpetua, by reason of this Act, shall not be eligible for parole under Act No. 4180, otherwise known as the Indeterminate Sentence Law, as amended."[53]
	GR No. 172707 2013-10-01	PEOPLE v. HALIL GAMBAO Y ESMAIL PEREZ, J.
There is prevailing jurisprudence,[74] on civil liabilities arising from the commission of kidnapping for the purpose of extorting ransom from the victim or any other person under Article 267 of the Revised Penal Code. The persons convicted were held liable for P75,000.00 as civil indemnity; P75,000.00 as moral damages; and P30,000.00 as exemplary damages.
	GR No. 185005 2012-12-10	PEOPLE v. DANTE DEJILLO LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
The Court, however, adds that accused-appellants shall not be eligible for parole. Under Section 3 of Republic Act No. 9346, "[p]ersons convicted of offenses punished with reclusion perpetua, or whose sentences will be reduced to reclusion perpetua, by reason of this Act, shall not be eligible for parole under Act No. 4180, otherwise known as the Indeterminate Sentence Law, as amended."[42]
	GR No. 189820 2012-10-10	PEOPLE v. ALBERTO M. BASAO LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
In Criminal Case No. C-369, where accused-appellants are convicted of the crime of Kidnapping for Ransom and Serious Illegal Detention, the Court of Appeals correctly reduced their sentence from death to reclusion perpetua considering the passage of Republic Act No. 9346, prohibiting the imposition of the death penalty. The Court likewise emphasizes that accused-appellants shall not be eligible for parole. Under Section 3 of Republic Act No. 9346, "[p]ersons convicted of offenses punished with reclusion perpetua, or whose sentences will be reduced to reclusion perpetua, by reason of this Act, shall not be eligible for parole under Act No. 4180, otherwise known as the Indeterminate Sentence Law, as amended."[41]