You're currently signed in as:
User

MARILOU RIVERA v. CA

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2005-08-30
CARPIO, J.
Felomina had no right over Lot 2. However, Felomina still caused the reconstitution of the title of Lot 2. Reconstitution is simply the restoration of a lost or destroyed instrument or title to its original form and condition.[11] Felomina had nothing to reconstitute as no certificate of title was ever issued to her over Lot 2. The fraud in the reconstitution of Lot 2 is evident.