This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2009-10-02 |
VELASCO JR., J. |
||||
| From the foregoing circumstances, reason dictates that we conclude that petitioners remained at their post under the instructions of respondent. We can further conclude that respondent dictated upon petitioners that the latter perform their regular duties to secure the premises during operating hours. This, to our mind and under the circumstances, is sufficient to establish the existence of an employer-employee relationship. Certainly, the facts as narrated by petitioners are more believable than the irrational denials made by respondent. Thus, we ruled in Lee Eng Hong v. Court of Appeals:[9] | |||||
|
2004-03-31 |
CORONA, J. |
||||
| Appellant was a convicted felon for the crime of homicide[4] in Criminal Case No. 1414 in the Regional Trial Court, Branch 66, Baler, Aurora. He was serving sentence in the Iwahig Prison Farm, Puerto Princesa City, Palawan, when he escaped from confinement on July 11, 1995. | |||||