Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 188882 2010-03-30	PHILIPPINE VETERANS BANK v. NLRC BRION, J.
In addition, the petitioner is already estopped from belatedly raising the issue of lack of jurisdiction since it has actively participated in the proceedings before the LA and NLRC. We have consistently held that while jurisdiction may be assailed at any stage, a party's active participation in the proceedings before a court without jurisdiction will estop such party from assailing such lack of it. It is an undesirable practice of a party participating in the proceedings and submitting his case for decision and then accepting the judgment, only if favorable, and attacking it for lack of jurisdiction, when adverse.[9]
	GR No. 127692 2004-03-10	FORTUNATO GOMEZ v. CA AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
SO ORDERED.[5] Due to the defendants' failure to deliver the owner's duplicate of TCT Nos. 10616 and 31856, the RTC issued an order on August 29, 1995 declaring said titles null and void, and ordering the Register of Deeds of Cebu City to issue new titles in the name of herein petitioners.[6]