Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

BIENVENIDO M. CADALIN v. POEA ADMINISTRATOR

This case has been cited 5 times or more.

	GR No. 167678 2010-06-22	SOUTHEASTERN SHIPPING v. FEDERICO U. NAVARRA DEL CASTILLO, J.
In Cadalin v. POEA's Administrator,[13] we held that Article 291 of the Labor Code covers all money claims from employer-employee relationship. "It is not limited to money claims recoverable under the Labor Code, but applies also to claims of overseas contract workers".[14]
	GR No. 172342 2009-07-13	LWV CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. MARCELO B. DUPO QUISUMBING, J.
In Cadalin v. POEA's Administrator,[27] we held that Article 291 covers all money claims from employer-employee relationship and is broader in scope than claims arising from a specific law. It is not limited to money claims recoverable under the Labor Code, but applies also to claims of overseas contract workers.[28] The following ruling in Cadalin v. POEA's Administrator is instructive: First to be determined is whether it is the Bahrain law on prescription of action based on the Amiri Decree No. 23 of 1976 or a Philippine law on prescription that shall be the governing law.
	GR No. 173637 2009-04-21	DANTE T. TAN v. PEOPLE CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
In Cadalin v. Philippine Overseas Employment Administration's Administrator,[32] the Court, considering also the complexity of the cases and the conduct of the parties' lawyers, held that the right to speedy disposition was not violated therein.
	GR No. 168923 2008-11-28	BIENVENIDO M. CADALIN v. CA NACHURA, J.
Accordingly, in the NLRC proceedings conducted from 1997 to 2001, the legitimate parties are limited to the following: (1) the 149 claimants identified and listed in Annex "B" of the September 2, 1991 NLRC Resolution; and (2) the 752 claimants listed in Annexes "D" and "E" of the September 2, 1991 Resolution:[57]
	GR No. 154460 2005-11-22	LAURO C. DEGAMO v. AVANTGARDE SHIPPING CORP. QUISUMBING, J.
In Cadalin v. POEA's Administrator,[9] we held that Article 291 covers all money claims from employer-employee relationship and is broader in scope than claims arising from a specific law. It is not limited to money claims recoverable under the Labor Code, but applies also to claims of overseas contract workers.