This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2015-10-21 |
VILLARAMA, JR., J. |
||||
| In sum, we hold that the lower courts did not commit reversible error when they found the testimony of Marife sufficient to establish that accused-appellant murdered Bartolome. Well-settled is the rule that findings of fact of the trial court and the CA are not to be disturbed on appeal and are entitled to great weight and respect.[24] We find no cogent reason to disturb the findings and conclusion of the RTC and CA. | |||||
|
2006-11-27 |
GARCIA, J. |
||||
| The CA found no cogent reason to disturb the trial court's finding that both BPI-FSB and Villa assured the Domingos that they would eventually be placed in possession of the premises in question as sublessee. Nor do we. Not only is there evidence to corroborate this finding; it is likewise the version more consistent with common human experience. Finding no reversible error in the trial court's appraisal and appreciation of the facts and evidence on record, it was not amiss for the CA to adhere to the well-entrenched precept that factual findings of trial courts are entitled to great weight and respect, even finality in certain cases.[10] This Court can do no less. | |||||