You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

RAMON RASE v. NLRC

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR No. 153660
2003-06-10
PRUDENCIO BANTOLINO v. COCA-COLA BOTTLERS PHILS.
BELLOSILLO, J.
In Rase v. NLRC,[10]this Court likewise sidelined a similar challenge when it ruled that it was not necessary for the affiants to appear and testify and be cross-examined by counsel for the adverse party. To require otherwise would be to negate the rationale and purpose of the summary nature of the proceedings mandated by the Rules and to make mandatory the application of the technical rules of evidence.