Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 186101 2009-10-12	GINA A. DOMINGO VELASCO JR., J.
Thus, between the categorical statements of the prosecution witnesses, on the one hand, and bare denials of the accused, on the other hand, the former must, perforce, prevail.[16]
	GR No. 186497 2009-09-17	PEOPLE v. HASANADDIN GUIARA Y BANSIL VELASCO JR., J.
Thus, the categorical statements of the prosecution witnesses must prevail over the bare denials of the accused.[33] Denial, if unsubstantiated by clear and convincing evidence, is a negative and self-serving evidence which deserves no weight in law and cannot be given greater evidentiary value over the testimony of the credible witnesses who testify on affirmative matters.[34]