This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2015-10-05 |
DEL CASTILLO, J. |
||||
| Herein respondent's situation is not much different from therein petitioners' situation in the Periquet[73] and Samaniego[74] cases. To the same effect: Mendoza, Jr. v. San Miguel Foods, Inc.[75] Sicangco v. National Labor Relations Commission[76] Casimiro v. Stern Real Estate, Inc.[77] and Sarocam Interorient Maritime Ent., Inc.[78] | |||||
|
2011-07-18 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| SMPI posits that the Court of Appeals' finding of illegal dismissal was at best conjectural, based as it is on a misapprehension of facts and on Gucaban's self-serving allegations of alienation and humiliation which, nevertheless, could not have given sufficient motivation for her to resign. It insists that Gucaban, in exchange for a benefits package, has voluntarily tendered her resignation following the presentation to her of the possibility of company reorganization and of the resulting abolition of her office as necessitated by the company's business losses at the time. It adds that Gucaban has, in fact, been able to negotiate with the company for a better separation package which she voluntarily accepted as shown by her unconditional resignation letter and the accompanying Receipt and Release form. [31] It cites Samaniego v. NLRC, [32] Sicangco v. NLRC, [33] Domondon v. NLRC [34] and Guerzon v. Pasig Industries, Inc. [35] to support its cause. [36] | |||||