This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2009-02-04 |
QUISUMBING, J. |
||||
| Finally, as regards the third issue, respondents invoke the case of Development Bank of the Philippines v. NLRC [32] to justify the award of backwages to Montecillo. Unfortunately, their reliance on the said case is misplaced. In Development Bank of the Philippines v. NLRC, the Court affirmed the grant by the NLRC of benefits prayed for by the respondents therein in their position paper even if the same were not included as part of the original claim. Significantly, no new party intervened to seek additional relief from the Commission. | |||||
|
2006-11-28 |
CARPIO, J. |
||||
| We repeatedly upheld our ruling in Eagle regarding reimbursement in the subsequent cases of Spartan Security & Detective Agency, Inc. v. NLRC,[14] Development Bank of the Philippines v. NLRC,[15] Alpha Investigation and Security Agency, Inc. v. NLRC,[16] Helpmate, Inc. v. NLRC, et al.,[17] and Lapanday Agricultural Development Corporation v. Court of Appeals.[18] | |||||