This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2013-02-25 |
VELASCO JR., J. |
||||
| It must be shown that the person concerned has performed an overt act in pursuance or furtherance of the complicity.[134] In fact, mere knowledge, acquiescence or approval of the act, without the cooperation or approval to cooperate, is not sufficient to prove conspiracy.[135] There must be positive and conclusive factual evidence indicating the existence of conspiracy,[136] and not simple inferences, conjectures and speculations[137] speciously sustained because "[i]t cannot be mere coincidence."[138] | |||||